|


Steve Scroggins
|
Steve Scroggins is a volunteer contributor to the Georgia
Heritage Council who lives in Macon. He is the deranged creative force behind
the X-Files parodies.
EMAIL THIS
PRINT THIS
Share
|
Another SPLC Drive-by Smear – Commentary by Steve Scroggins, 2/11/2011
"Our archives contain a number of articles illustrating SPLC's track record of mercenary character assassination, disinformation, greed,
distortions, and outright falsehoods." --J.A. Davis & Steve Scroggins in
SPLC's Reputation as Frauds & Conmen Grows, 8/21/09.
"[It's] scandalous that those who defend that cause [secession, independence] today should be smeared as partisans of slavery." --Joseph Sobran, syndicated
columnist 1/21/2001
Here we go again: Another drive-by smear from the Southern Poverty Law Center. This time, the target is Thomas DiLorenzo, a noted author and Loyola
University professor of Economics. To be more accurate, the SPLC is the profiteering label-gun dealer supplying smears for
Zombie Journalists and politicians
to use in their hit and run attacks.
As illustrated in his archive of work on the LewRockwell.com
website, Professor DiLorenzo can take care of himself. He's perfectly capable of issuing a stinging
rebuttal to these smear-masters. And yet I feel compelled to comment.
DiLorenzo testified in the Congressional hearings on The Federal Reserve chaired by
Rep. Ron Paul on Feburary 9th. DiLorenzo's testimony was
posted on LewRockwell.com on
February 10th and perhaps elsewhere as early as last night. Read it carefully to detect any appalling "hate" or for any mention of secession, Lincoln or
tyranny. OK, maybe you have to look between the lines?
As reported by Washington Post writer Felicia Sonmez, in a story entitled
Ron Paul holds first hearing on Federal Reserve,
committee member Rep. William Clay (D., Mo.) had no questions for DiLorenzo, but rather just launched into
an attack on DiLorenzo, sneering at some of DiLorenzo's historical commentary and expressing shock over DiLorenzo's alleged membership in the League of the South,
which was described in typical Zombie journalist style as, "an
organization that has been designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a 'neo-Confederate' hate group advocating for Southern secession."
Washington Post Op-Ed Columnist Dana Milbank penned a commentary dated Feb 9th and entitled "Ron Paul's economic Rx: a Southern secessionist." Milbank
sniped at Rep. Ron Paul for "appearing to be winging it" and questioning his judgment for calling DiLorenzo as a witness. Milbank's ignorant
argument here is that if DiLorenzo believes in the states' right to secession, then we can't even consider his ideas on economics or anything else for that matter.
Milbank never got around to criticizing DiLorenzo's economic/banking ideas or testimony. The smear, the label was all that mattered.
The Hill published a story by Peter Schroeder entitled
"Dem accuses witness invited by Ron Paul of 'hate group' ties".
This story, too, was just about Rep. Clay's attempt to assassinate DiLorenzo's character, not about anything DiLorenzo said or any rebuttal to DiLorenzo's comments.
The New American (published by the John Birch Society), a group the SPLC doesn't hesitate to smear for its anti-communist "extremism", published the best
assessment of what happened in it's story entitled
First Fed Hearing
Begins with Democratic Character Attack.
That story by Thomas R Eddlem, starts with a summary sentence:
"The ranking Democrat on the House Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology Subcommittee began the first hearing on the Federal Reserve Bank in the new
Congress with dramatic ad hominem attacks on Loyola University Maryland Economics Professor Thomas DiLorenzo. Rep. William Clay of Missouri accused
DiLorenzo of having racist ties for being an adviser to the League of the South, a states'-rights organization, and then failed to address any
substantive questions on economics to DiLorenzo with the dismissive remark: 'I do know that I have no questions for you.'" [emphasis added]
Eddlem nails Rep. Clay for his lack of homework, unlike hacks such as Dana Milbank who were applauding Clay for doing smear 'homework' on DiLorenzo.
"It has been difficult for my staff to locate any recent work of yours as an economist," Clay
told DiLorenzo during the committee hearing,
even though DiLorenzo has written three books on the history of banking, including
Hamilton's Curse, on the
First Bank of the United States. DiLorenzo is also a prolific writer for the
Ludwig von Mises Institute, the most prominent think tank associated with the
Austrian economics school.
It's rather obvious that Clay did NO HOMEWORK on DiLorenzo or his views on economics. (Try a Google search for "Thomas DiLorenzo economics") Instead Clay's
staff went straight to the
Zombie Journalist's Bible,
the smear dealers known as the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Other reporters who chimed in today went to their Zombie Bible for more juicy stuff.
The Dallas Morning News story by reporter Todd Gillman gasps this horrific title:
Neo-Confederate economist at Ron Paul's Fed hearing (text below).
Gillman immediately went to the Zombie Journalist's Bible
and uncovered that DiLorenzo has addressed various southern heritage groups over the years. Gillman even called the SPLC to get a quote from them and Heidi
Beirich is only happy to oblige. According to Gillman, Beirich called it "appalling...for a congressman to bring someone in from a group that has these
kind of hate views."
What's appalling are SPLC's distortions.
How exactly does Beirich and the SPLC make the leap from secession and independence to "hate?" Every July 4th most Americans celebrate this document known as the Declaration of
Independence. I wonder if the SPLC has heard of it. Or do they classify the Continental Congress, the signers of the Declaration and Thomas Jefferson as some
kind of 'hate group'? Despite the SPLC's best distortions and sophistry, they cannot demonstrate that the League of the South is any more a 'hate group' than they
can the Founding Fathers.
"If the Declaration of Independence justified the secession of 3,000,000 colonists in 1776, I do not see why the Constitution ratified by the same men should
not justify the secession of 5,000,000 of the Southerners from the Federal Union in 1861... the great principle embodied by Jefferson in the Declaration of
Independence that government derives its power from the consent of the governed is sound and just..." ---Horace Greeley, New York Tribune, 12/17/1860
Gillman includes this unattributed factoid: "The League seeks a Southern breakaway nation led by "European-Americans." Says who? Oh, never mind,
of course Heidi added that little gem in order to infer that DiLorenzo is not only a secessionist but also a "racist." By failing to attribute that
statement to anyone, or a website...it's just there presented as fact. The only redeeming thing
about Gillman's item was the rebuttal COMMENT posted by a reader:
The Southern Poverty Law Center's unwritten (actual) definition of a "hate group" is as follows. Any group whose philosophy the SPLC hates.
That about sums it up. There is no official definition of a 'hate group', no formal criteria. It's just whoever SPLC wants to smear today.
The bottom line is this. DiLorenzo's writings on economics and banking, the various books and essays he's written on the topic, and of course his
testimony at the
hearing should be the only relevant views explored for the purpose of this hearing. Smearing him about his political views or his views on secession,
or the use of smear terms like 'neo-confederate' are merely ad hominem attacks -- attempts to discredit his economic expertise based on his political
views and distortions of those views. Guilt by association or innuendo.
The SPLC counts its money and laughs with delight as the
Zombie Journalists
swarm into a feeding frenzy, murdering the Truth and seeking to eat the brains of their readers...many of whom won't miss them because they're not using
them anyway.
"I am myself persuaded, on the basis of extensive study of the historical evidence, that... the severity of each of the contractions - 1920-21, 1929-33, and
1937-38 - is directly attributable to acts of commission and omission by the Reserve authorities and would not have occurred under earlier monetary and
banking arrangements." --Milton Friedman
"The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks." --Lord Acton
Steve Scroggins
is Commander of the Lt. James T. Woodward Camp 1399, Sons of Confederate
Veterans, in Warner Robins, GA. He is the deranged creative force behind
the X-Files parodies.
|
Todd J. Gillman/Reporter, DallasNews, Feb. 10, 2011
Texas Rep. Ron Paul intended his first hearing as chair of a House subcommittee to showcase one of his complaints about the Federal Reserve - that central planning of the money supply makes unemployment worse, by creating booms that inevitably lead to recessions worse than would otherwise occur.
The hearing did do that. But that was overshadowed somewhat when Democrats noted that Paul's star witnesses, Thomas DiLorenzo, an economist at
Loyola University in Baltimore, has called Abraham Lincoln a "dictator" and "mass murderer" - and has links to a neo-Confederate group called
League of the South.
The League seeks a Southern breakaway nation led by "European-Americans."
To hear DiLorenzo tell it, linking him to the League is defamation. His only connection, he told the DMN, is that he lectured to some League
members "15 years ago" at the invitation of an Emory University professor, and didn't even realize they were League members. He did concede,
though, that he sympathizes with anyone who wants to secede from a government they disagree with, be they Southerners in the USA or Soviet
Republics under the USSR.
His dismissal of any substantive link don't square with material collected by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which views the League as a hate group.
Issues of the "Southern Patriot" - the League's newsletter - describe DiLorenzo as a lecturer at its 2001 summer school and 2002 national
conference. The League also sold tapes of his lectures.
In late 2000, he authored a front-page essay for the League's Alabama affiliate about vote fraud; its newsletter identified him as a League member.
And in 2005, DiLorenzo authored an essay defending the League.
Heidi Beirich, research director at the Southern Poverty Law Center, called it "appalling... for a congressman to bring someone in from a group that
has these kinds of hate views."
Paul said he didn't know about DiLorenzo's involvement with the League and said Democrats only attacked to deflect attention from the substance of
the Fed critique.
http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/02/neo-confederate-economist-at-r.html
COMMENTS
Dan A. 2:53 PM on February 10, 2011
Nice smear, Todd J. Gillman.
Now, if you don't mind the rigors of ethical journalism, then please explain to your readers:
-- Why many renowned black scholars agree with DiLorenzo's characterizations of Lincoln — e.g., Lerone Bennett Jr., whose castigation of Lincoln makes DiLorenzo's polemics look overly tepid. (Is Lerone Bennett Jr., too, a "Neo-Confederate"?)
-- Why the same black scholars — and innumerable other well-informed non-Anglos such as myself — agree with the League of the South's political and economic views. (Are they, too, a "Neo-Confederate" "hate group"?)
-- Why there are innumerable non-Anglo members of League of the South, such as Hispanics, Arabs, East Asians, Jews, and — wait for it! — blacks. (Are they, too, "Neo-Confederates"?)
-- Whence you pulled this unqualified, scare-quoted jab: "The League seeks a Southern breakaway nation led by 'European-Americans.'" (You gave no attribution; did you fabricate it yourself?)
-- Why your headline is not a fraudulent ploy to get readers to read this "news report" about an issue affecting the lives of everyone (except maybe the parasitical elite, of which I hope you are not vying to be a member).
Thank you, in advance.
Now, for a quick lesson in intellectual honesty...
The Southern Poverty Law Center's unwritten (actual) definition of a "hate group" is as follows. Any group whose philosophy the SPLC hates.
|
Like this? SIGN UP now
for weekly email updates in your inbox !!
Contribute now to help us maintain this website and carry on our mission!
Related Links
SPLC's Reputation as Frauds & Conmen Grows - J.A. Davis & Steve Scroggins, 8/21/09
Hate Watch - get more scoop on the SPLC
Secession, Treason, the Founders, and…the "Goonies" - Bill Vallante, 1/29/11
Vertical Debt Limit - Steve Scroggins, 3/02/10
Empire or Liberty? - Steve Scroggins, 2/26/10
Washington's Integrity - Steve Scroggins, 2/22/10
Comparing Day and Night: Washington v. Obama - X-Files parody, 2/22/10
Voting Rights, Responsibilities (Part 2) - Steve Scroggins, 2/19/10
Voting Rights, Responsibilities (Part 1) - Steve Scroggins, 2/08/10
The American Ideal of 1776: The Twelve Basic American Principles - Hamilton Abert Long
America: Ripe for Destruction? - Steve Scroggins, 2/10/10
Serious About the Constitution - Steve Scroggins, 11/12/09
Perils of Democracy - Part 5 - J.A. Davis & Steve Scroggins
Perils of Democracy - Part 1 - J.A. Davis & Steve Scroggins
Perils of Democracy - Part 2 - J.A. Davis & Steve Scroggins
Perils of Democracy - Part 3 - J.A. Davis & Steve Scroggins
Perils of Democracy - Part 4 - J.A. Davis & Steve Scroggins
American federalism: What Changed between 1787 and 2005? - Steve Scroggins, Nov. 2005
An Important Distinction: Democracy versus Republic
America's Worst Scandal: the 14th Amendment - J.A. Davis
FDR's 'rewriting' of the Constitution - Ben Shapiro
FDR v. Constitution: The Court-Packing Fight and the Triumph of Democracy - by Burt Solomon
Crisis and Leviathan - by Robert Higgs
Emancipating Slaves, Enslaving Free Men: A History of the American Civil War - by Jeffrey Rogers Hummel
Founders' Wisdom v. ignorance and 'democracy' - Steve Scroggins, 4/26/07
The Judicial Activist Coup D'Etat -- Steve Scroggins
Slavery, Apologies & Duty - Steve Scroggins
Liberty Lost - Part 1 - J.A. Davis
Liberty Lost - Part 2 - J.A. Davis
Liberty Lost - Part 3 - J.A. Davis
Liberty Lost - Part 8 - J.A. Davis
Repeal the 17th Amendment - articlev.com
EMAIL THIS
PRINT THIS
Share
Copyright © 2003-2012, GeorgiaHeritageCouncil.org
Georgia Heritage Council | 2121 Hollywood RD
Atlanta, GA 30318 Email:
|



|