PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Part I of a 3 part commentary by Joan Hough
So today, you and your offspring fasten your eyes on our
American flag
—the flag our valiant U.S. Marine
sons died for while planting it high on Iwo Jima--The flag, so many brave
Americans have had placed on coffins containing their bodies brought home from a
police action or a constitutionally declared World War. (Does any American
military person get the United Nations flag on his coffin? Some must wear that
UN hat.)
You place your right hands on your hearts and recite:
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of
American and to the
REPUBLIC
for which it stands—one nation under God,
INDIVISIBLE with
liberty and
justice for all."
How little you know about this pledge now considered so
wonder-filled, so marvelous, so patriotic, and so important in United States
history. Because the Pledge of Allegiance is a part of our American history, it
behooves us to familiarize ourselves with the its history, so we will give
consideration to that, but first, if you will, let us explore some rather
fascinating facts about our famous pledge pertaining to the meanings of the
words "Republic" and "indivisible."
America was not longer a true REPUBLIC when this bit of oral
recitation was written in 1892 and adopted. (In fact, the author of the pledge,
Francis Bellamy, loathed Republics, but more about that and him later.) There
can be no honest denial of the truth—our nation was not one then, is NOT NOW A
REPUBLIC, and has not been SINCE 1860. Several of our U.S. Presidents, including
the current one, openly have declared ours a DEMOCRACY. (President Bush II, has
not only declared it a Democracy, but has determined it our duty to take
Democracy to the rest of the World—(whether they would have it or not, whether
they have the ability/foundation to understand it or not). President Roosevelt
took us into war to "make the world safe for Democracy."
Oddly, the word DEMOCRACY does not appear anywhere in the U.S.
Constitution which was declared the LAW OF THE LAND by the very men who created
our government. The Declaration of Independence, also, does not use that word.
There can be no doubt that our founding fathers knew the meaning of the word,
but, deliberately, rejected the word and rejected the form of government the
word defines.
But now we, without our permission, have seen our national form
of government
converted from a Republic into a Democracy. (We might just as
well have remained under the control of a King, for we have surrendered our
Constitutional form of government.) Democracy is government by the masses. A
single word best describes it—"mobocracy." Democracy can exist as a permanent
form of government until voters discover they can vote themselves into all the
wealth in the public treasury. Its death commences when voters put into office
those candidates promising them the most goodies. (Does that ring a bell?) It is
followed by dictatorship usually disguised as a form of socialism.
A perfect example of democracy is found in the early west when a
collection of cowboys could decide to hang even an innocent range-interloper.
The gang of cowboys voted for the hanging. The prisoner voted against it. The
gang won. Majority ruled! The prisoner lost. Passion, prejudice, impulses ruled
the day. The judgment was based on passions and not LAW. Democracy in action.
Mob rule!
Sadly, most Americans, including most of our historians and
grand scholars, appear unaware that even the word "Democracy" was an anathema to
our nation’s founding fathers. Our founding fathers knew that Democracies die
far too early deaths, literally killing themselves. They knew democracies can
become incredibly silly and obese—requiring the vote of many thousands of
citizens on each little mundane matter…and reflecting the wishes of "the mob."
Democracies become "mob rule." …Democracies mutate into forms of Nazism/
socialism/Communism--all a
single form of government which hides under
its skirts, dictators and "oliogarchs" (small numbers of elitist controllers).
And what is a Republic? It is a form of government in which all
power rests in the citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by their
representatives-- the men and women whom the people put into office. These
elected representatives of the people must govern according to definite rules of
law (the U.S. Constitution) and not as the results of greed or passion. A
Republic is a government based on LAW. In a Democracy, the majority always
rules, even when the majority is crazed. In a Republic, the law controls
government itself. The power of government is limited by the law. The law in our
America is found in the U.S. Constitution. The law protects the people from the
government—(or it did when the U.S. government obeyed the Constitution.)
The founding fathers, scorning a Democratic type of government,
chose instead to give us a vastly superior form of government--a Republic –which
we have been unable to keep! We have let it die or, more truthfully, we have let
our adored politicians in the Oval Office, in Congress, and in the Supreme Court
murder it.
When did the killing start? When we understand the ramifications
to the answer for that question, we understand why the word "indivisible"
reflects a lie perpetrated on Americans and the world since the 1860’s.
‘INDIVISIBLE’ –meaning, our nation "Cannot be divided." But is
that so? Is this true? Did the South have the legal right to divide itself from
the New England states?--from the North? Was secession then and is it now still
legal? Despite the government’s control of public school curricula. teacher
education and textbooks, despite the government’s continued, sustained efforts
to cover up the crimes of the past, there are now at least a few million people
in America who know secession is legal—was then, is now! Many Americans in the
North, as well as the South, are positive that this is the truth, the whole truth and
nothing but the truth.
Certainly, prior to the War, every graduate of West Point was
taught that secession was the Constitutional right of every state in the nation.
Even General Sherman, General Sheridan, and General Grant learned the same truth
at West Point that U.S. hero soldiers, Jeff Davis and Robert E. Lee learned
there about the legality of secession. (And yes, for those of you
history-deprived souls, Davis and Lee were both U.S. soldiers and heroes before
becoming Confederate heroes.)
Ours has not been a true Republic since Abe Lincoln and his
rich, wanting to get richer and more politically powerful,
Industrialists-Republicans fired the first cannon holes in the U.S. Constitution
by lying to a gullible Northern public and denying the absolutely moral and
legal right of the Southern States or any state to secede from the Union.
Denying this truth, Lincoln and his Republicans began the alteration of
Constitutional government in America. These Republicans managed to hide from the
Northern public the fact that even the New England states had once begun the act
of seceding from the union, ceasing only when the Treaty with England was signed
by the Americans at the end of the War of 1812. Fully knowing the truth, Lincoln
and his Republicans told the world their nastiest big lie--that secession was
unconstitutional. (As some American teenagers said, "Like you can’t get a
divorce when your spouse is cruel.")
The Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation,
the Constitutions of each state, and the U.S. Constitution, as altered and
approved by the signers, created a nation of 13 states, of separate, but
cooperative members. Each state remained as sovereign as any nation in the
world, but joined together in cooperation with others to form a nation while,
jealously, guarding its rights. King George of England, in the Treat of Paris
ending the American Revolution, recognized not a single American nation, but
THIRTEEN individual "states.—"States" according to the language of the times,
meant thirteen "nations."
In that last paragraph of our Declaration of Independence, we
read these words:
(Note the lowercase u in the word "united" when used before
"states".
"We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of
America, in General Congress…. do, in the Name and by Authority of the good
People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United
Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they
are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political
connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be
totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power
to levy War, that have full Power to levy War, conclude peace, contract
Alliances, establish Commerce and to do all other Acts and Things which
Independent States may of right do."
At the conclusion of that first war for Southern liberty, which,
also, gave the North, its liberty, England, herself, acknowledged the
sovereignty of each individual state. In the legal document declaring the
independence of each and all states.—each state was individually, named by
England. England did not identify the cooperative group of states as ONE NATION.
She did not give independence to the United States of America, but to each
state, separately and independently—each state, an independent NATION.
In joining with the other states in the Articles of
Confederation, to create the United States, no state gave up its sovereign
right. The same occurred when the states created and accepted the U.S.
Constitution. None other than a minute number of rights did they assign, in the
Constitution, to the central government. According to the Constitution, the
central government was severely limited in power. A STATE’S RIGHTS REMAINED
SUPREME. Each state had its own Constitution and none chose to surrender its
position of supremacy (its sovereignty) to a central government, or to a Supreme
Court.
.Even today there are many nations elsewhere in the world
smaller than many of our U.S. states. When the Declaration of Independence was
written, the word "state" meant, at that time, "nation" and continues to bear
that meaning today. Each U.S. state was filled with folks who understood
oppression and had a firm foundation in knowledge of the world’s past and
present governments and of those rights earned by battles and deaths from the
King of England. Americans, with the Magna Carta as an example, chose to create
a government in which common men had control over temporary leaders—(no lifetime
jobs for the elected). Common men held control over the senior body because of
the election of the U.S. Senators by their home state legislators. The U.S.
Senators, by not being elected in a POPULAR election—not "democratically"
elected, could be held to their duty by the state legislators. In the true form
of a Republic, the "national" U.S. Senators could be held accountable to the
people; the people could hold the National senators feet to the fire through the
actions of their local state legislators at the state capital. The state
legislators had the power to recall the U.S. Senators, when necessary and the
power to give them directions and to make them give explanations of their
actions. The people of the state, truly, had control of their U.S. Senators when
we had a Republic-- because the people of each state had close contact with
their state legislators who, unlike the "national" Senators lived and worked,
daily, near their homes among the folks in their state.
It took a few years after Lincoln’s Republicans broke off the
first chunks of the Republic before the Republican government was able to
convince the people to give up control of the U.S. Senators. After lengthy,
concerted propaganda, this was, eventually, achieved (to the great joy of most
Senators) and a major obstacle to the elimination of the Republic was overcome.
(The Senate voted for the 17th amendment in 1911 while Republicans were in
control. Republicans were in control, also, in 1912 when the House passed the
bill.)
Lincoln and his radicals, after the War, made erroneous claims
that they "saved the union." Lincoln even convinced many of his Northern
countrymen that he fought the war to "save the Union." At the conclusion of the
war of Northern Aggression in which Lincoln’s army repeatedly invaded a
sovereign nation, the Lincoln Republicans forced Southerners, at the point of
bayonets, into a form of white slavery and back into the Union. The
Republicans even imprisoned or tortured and killed white Southerners who dared
voice the truth either about the War or the horrors of Reconstruction imposed on
whites and many blacks during a more than ten year period after the end of that
Northern Blood feast. The Lincolnites inflicted genocide on white Southerners
and any blacks who were friends of the whites. No matter what horrendous
cover-up lies members of the Lincoln cult of historians and their indoctrinated
followers have continued to prattle, generations of white and black Southerners
have known the truth about Northern atrocities in the South. By illegally
imprisoning, without benefit of trial by jury, thousands of Northern newspaper
publishers and editors, by destroying the presses and arresting those who wrote
any words suggesting that secession was legal, Lincoln and his Republicans
successfully eliminated the voices of all those who disagreed with the
Republican plan to punish the South with war for its refusing to pay the
enormous taxes sought by the Northern Republican industrialists. To take and
redistribute the rich lands of the south and kill or run from the continent all
white Southerners was the dream of the industrialists. The "Lincolnites" placed
their propaganda against the South into the minds and hearts of most
Northerners--a necessity, if the North’s sons were to kill Southerners who
looked just like them and were Christians, just as they were, and who were, in
many instances, their relatives.
The Lincolnites’ arrests of all who voiced disapproval of the
War of Northern Aggression, probably served to prevent all but a few northern
draft riots. Their lies filled their newspapers and promoted disgust and hate
for Southerners among the Northern populace. (In later years, Adolph Hitler took
lessons from Lincoln’s acts and put them most successfully into use.) There can
be no doubt that Lincoln micromanaged his generals and his war so that genocide
was actuated. Interestingly, a Russian in the Lincoln army taught Lincoln the
tricks of the trade and, most especially, the value of burning the homes and,
systematically, destroying the lives of women, children, the elderly, the
handicapped, and the ill. Lincoln’s "total war" practices were inspired by the
Russian and, oddly, by the Russian’s wife.
"…WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL?
Ask Confederate descendant historians about that! Ask
Southerners who have proof that their flesh and blood fought bravely a second
war for American liberty---one Yankees erroneously name "The Civil War," "The
Rebellion," "The War Between the States," but which most Southerners know was a
War for Southern Independence—for freedom from an all powerful dictatorship
government and from unjust Republican taxation. Confederates received thereafter
merciless, vengeful treatment throughout their lives on this earth. Their
descendants, in more ways than Yankees can imagine, still feel the after shock
from the Lincoln Republican scourge of the South—from the genocide committed by
those under Lincoln’s direction.
Impossible for the Lincoln cult historians to believe,
Southerners so loved the U.S. Constitution that they left the nation they,
themselves had suffered and shed blood to build, when Lincoln and
his Republicans altered the Constitution without re-writing a
single word, while imposing a dreadful burden of unjust taxation upon the South
and a long train of abuses and usurpations amounting to despotism.
At the time their Second War for Independence began, there were
still alive some Southerners who had participated in that first war. There were,
literally, thousands upon thousands of young Southerner males who had heard the
details of the cause of that First War. These young men and their fathers knew
the agonies experienced by those of their blood who had fought to gain freedom
for their kin, their friends, and each single Southern state. Theirs was a war
making possible the adoption of a wondrous U.S. Constitution –unique in the
history of the world—a Constitution in which not one single state gave up the
sovereignty hard-won from the British in that First War for Independence.
The sources for much of the information found herein include
works by Frank Conner, Thomas J. DiLorenzo, James & Walter Donald Kennedy, and
Kevin R. c. Gutzman,
Contact Joan Hough at joanhough@aol.com.