
Jeff Davis
|
Jeff Davis is a retired radio-TV journalist living in Gainesville, GA. Active in civic and political affairs,
he is past president of the Georgia Jaycees, former vice president of the US and the world Jaycees, former campaign chairman of the Georgia Republican party. He
voluntarily serves as chairman of the Georgia Heritage Council.
He is a collateral descendant of President Jefferson Davis.
|
In Remembrance of Jefferson Davis And What If? - Commentary by J. A. Davis
“[T]he principle for which we contended is bound to reassert itself,
though it may be at another time and in another form." ---Jefferson Davis
On the eve of the 199th birthday celebration of President Jefferson
Davis on June 3rd, I pause to think what it will be in the public
recognition of this monumental American during the coming year and after.
Will there be commentaries and editorials that accurately depict the
true manner of the man who many believe to be among the leading
advocates of Constitutional liberty in America?
Sadly, outside of my friend,
Calvin Johnson,
who regularly remembers
occasions such as this, I don't expect to hear or read much. I suppose it is insulation against unrealized
expectations.
The truth is, the absence of respect, admiration and remembrance is not
reflective of how President Davis would be affected. It is more of a blight and the
demise of all Constitutional liberty in the minds of too many Americans.
Consider this. You hear all these politicians who claim to be conservative
and give you every impression they take their oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution as a most
solemn obligation.
When have you heard them extol the values given, defended and protected by
names that seem to have escaped their memory. Jefferson, Madison,
Adams, Franklin, Calhoun and Jefferson Davis, among others known as patriots?
Follow their votes and their very words. For the most part they have
found ways in both actions and mind to eliminate whole portions of the Constitution,
particularly the Bill of Rights.
How many of these warts on the posterior
of American liberty do you expect to even acknowledge the 199th birthday
of Jefferson Davis and the coming year of Davis?
Now let me go into the "what if" part of my thoughts today.
What if the New England Democrats in 1860 had convinced Jefferson Davis to be
a candidate for president, as they tried to do, unsuccessfully?
What if the Democrats in 1860 had the sense to know they couldn't split
their voting power in the nation three ways and hope to win?
What if in some wise meeting of the minds, John Breckinridge had seen
the likelihood of the Whigs, who had become Republicans, might prevail
in a U. S. election with only a fraction of the vote because of fragmented opposition?
What if Stephen Douglas acknowledged the same real scenario?
What if John Bell acknowledged the same scenario?
What if all three agreed they couldn't run three separate opposition
campaigns and hope to win?
What if they all agreed to get behind the
overwhelming consensus choice, Jefferson Davis, who wouldn't run because
he was committed to John Breckinridge?
What if all the Democrats came together behind the one candidate they
could all agree on, a devoted Southerner, who also was a unionist?
“I love the Union and the Constitution, but I would rather leave
the Union with the Constitution than remain in the Union without it." ---Jefferson Davis
Now, you may be saying this is all foolish,
it didn't happen. It is meaningless. You've got a good point.
Let me show you how we lost our way and then consider the horrendous
effect it has had on our country and its future.
Abraham Lincoln was the nominee of the
then recently formed Republican Party. He didn't win the nomination easily. As a matter of fact, he
trailed in votes until the third ballot. Some historians have claimed he would have never won the
nomination without the packing of the convention with Marxist immigrants of the
recent German Revolution.
Now we come to what is meaningful, and we no longer rely on
supposition.
Lincoln won the election by less than ten electoral votes.
[ Correction: It was 57 electoral votes per the
National Archives.]
Anyone who believes he was the favorite of the North and West needs to
examine states like California, Ohio, Oregon, New Jersey and Wisconsin
which he failed to carry a majority. He carried a Michigan majority by around 2,000 votes.
[ Correction: See
Results by State. ]
Lincoln won the election on less than 40% of the popular vote.
What if, just what if, Jefferson Davis had been the consensus Democrat
candidate? No one can say, but most students of electoral politics in America conclude that
Lincoln may not have carried states in the East that openly favored Davis. Speculation though it is, the
likelihood of Jefferson Davis as a consolidated Democrat candidate points to far more
than the few electoral votes needed to defeat Lincoln.
Back to reality, It is clear that the majority of the voters, 60%, did
not favor Lincoln for president.
Now, consider this:
If Jefferson Davis were elected in 1860,
would there have been a War Between the States?
If Mr. Davis were elected would we have
seen the vibrant expanse of opportunity in
the USA? Look at my previous commentary about his accomplishments
at Secretary of War to President Franklin Pierce, of New Hampshire, who,
by the way felt Jefferson Davis should be president in 1861 but the
situation was delicate because of the candidacy of Vice
President, John Breckinridge.
If Mr. Davis were elected do you suppose we would have seen the
deterioration of the Constitution we have witnessed? In his essay entitled,
The Imaginary Abe, Joseph Sobran writes,
How could Lincoln be so wrong? Well, he was a product of a later
generation of rising nationalism, typified by Daniel Webster and Henry Clay, that was out of touch with the
Founders and the Framers of the Constitution. As a matter of fact, the longer I study Lincoln, the more I am
convinced that he was simply ignorant of the greatest body of American political thought; I seriously doubt
that he ever read even The Federalist Papers.
If he did, he never assimilated their thinking about the
problems of “confederation,” “consolidation,” “usurpation,” and the like. Jefferson Davis was steeped in these
ideas and completely mastered them, as his memoirs show. Lincoln, however, couldn’t have carried on an
intelligent conversation with Madison, Hamilton, or his hero Jefferson (whose Kentucky Resolutions he
also seems ignorant of).
Finally, if Jefferson Davis had been our president in 1861, do you
think the politicians of today might have a little more respect for both his
name and great visions he had for the country he loved and gave large
part of his life in serving?
Well, he wasn't US president in 1861 but why should that change the
appropriate respect for what Davis did for his country and what he stood for?
I have tried to follow his advice though at times my will gets tested by
those who have little understanding of the man or his philosophy and guidance to us of this and
other generations. Then there are those who intentionally distort history to defame his character.
In this way I have tried to be a patriotic American, serving my country
in many ways. For all its faults, and they increase every day, it is still our last and best hope
on the face of this earth. Yes, I believe if the era beginning 1861 had
changed, our lives and our country today would be what
our Founders envisioned. We should never stop working to restore that grand
experiment.
We are today at the edge of a precipice
where our Republic's sovereignty is at stake. We need loyal unhypenated
Americans more than ever. We are perilously close to being rolled into a
world government with philosophies totally alien
to anything resembling our Founders ideals.
The time may be coming, as Mr. Davis predicted, that there will be a new
dawning of liberty though it may take a new and different form.
Happy birthday, Mr. President. We really do wonder how it would have
been if you could have met Mr. Lincoln at the ballot box rather than the
terrible ordeal on hundreds of battlefields our Republic suffered then,
and still suffers today as the direct result of one of the most significant blunders in American history.
Jeff Davis is a retired radio-TV journalist living in Gainesville, GA. Active in civic and political affairs,
he is past president of the Georgia Jaycees, former vice president of the US and the world Jaycees, former campaign chairman of the Georgia Republican party. He
voluntarily serves as chairman of the Georgia Heritage Council.
He is a collateral descendant of President Jefferson Davis.
Related Links
Remembering Jefferson Davis' Birthday - Calvin Johnson
The 1889 Funeral of Jefferson Davis - Calvin Johnson
Jefferson Davis and the Big 'S' - J.A. Davis
Happy Birthday, Mr. President - Jeff Davis
Jefferson Davis - Charley Reese
Jefferson Davis's Farewell to the U.S. Senate January 21, 1861
Was Jefferson Davis Right? - amazon.com
Inaugurual Address as Provisional President of the Confederacy - February 18, 1861
The Ethnic Cleansing of Dixie - Billy Bearden
Liberty Lost, part 7 - J.A. Davis
Founders' Wisdom v. ignorance and 'democracy' - Steve Scroggins
Rebuttal of McNaughton's Nonsense - Billy Bearden
Lies & Myth regurgitated at UGA - Steve Scroggins
Lincoln Hypocrisy - Steve Scroggins
Augusta Violation - A Review
General Forrest shows us the way - time to take the offensive - Commentary by Steve Scroggins
Grassroots organization essential to popular victory - J.A. Davis
Contact: Telephone 770 297-4788 P-6, 2363 North Cliff Colony Drive Gainesvlle,
GA 30501