With that in mind, guess what? The Democrats have just supported and passed at least a limited form of reduction of pork barrel spending to corporations. Where were the great Republican heroes that the talk show people call "Conservatives"? Fact is, they call themselves 'Conservatives' but people are getting wise to them. Sean Hannity who is a self-described 'Reagan Conservative' has dropped in audience tremendously and has been displaced from second behind O'Reilly. He may still be the leader of the neocons though.

Neocons are not Conservatives. Their main thrust is big federal government spending. They push the military industrial complex believing that war makes peace by occupying nations throughout the world along with a program of nation-building with a goal of remaking everyone in their own image for the glory of global empire. Neocons have strong belief in national powers over state and local choices in the federal system. They violate or willfully ignore the Constitution, using their idol, Abraham Lincoln, as an example. In many cases neocons support the Zionist takeover of the territories at East Jerusalem. Neocon origins go back to the Trotsky Communist regime.

Give the Democrats credit for taking them head-on over the Zionist refusal to allow any other settlers a right to live there. When the truth comes out it shows the Zionists, not the religious Jews, have violated a number of standing agreements. More power to the religious Jews.

If you think I'm anti-Zionist, I am. I'm very much pro Israel. It all started when the Zionists attacked the United States' unarmed intel ship, the USS Liberty (1967), killing 34 and wounding 171 of a crew of 297. First was the aerial attack followed by torpedo boats. The Liberty was ablaze and listing badly. Afterward, circling Israeli torpedo boats fired on crewmen trying to fight the fires. When the Liberty crew put their inflatable lifeboats in the water, the Israeli torpedo boats machine-gunned them rendering them useless. It was intended to be a massacre with no survivors, but the Israelis feared other U.S. ships arriving, so they left before the massacre "job" was completed. Despite the huge U.S. flag flying on the Liberty, the Israelis claimed it was a 'tragic error' of mistaken identity. Our government has done its best to downplay and conceal these war crimes from the general public. It wasn't the last cover up perpetrated for the benefit of Israel. [ View video below ]

Opposing Zionists is a good example of why we need two party politics and by that I mean a real choice. Who would ever believe I would be supporting at least a very few of the tenants of the Obama administration? Frank Conner has written here that what we have now is two wings of the same big government party. Bush or Gore? Bush or Kerry? McCain or Obama? These are not real choices, just different flavors of Big Government. Only Ron Paul, as he writes in My Plan for a Freedom President, offers a bold change of direction and a return to a Constitutional presidency.

It seems to me what I'm talking about here is exactly the idea our Framers had in mind when they urged open discussion, respect for the minority's rights, exposure and conviction for corruption and above all, consent of the governed. I don't believe the Obama administration has signed on to this latest Zionist maneuver, nor will they. I wish they would stand for right and truth on international as well as domestic spending issues. They would have a leg up on the Republicans who became something else since the days of Eisenhower, Goldwater and Reagan.

It was Reagan who said in 1962, "I didn't leave the Democratic party. The Party left me." It's fair to say that the Republicans AND the Democrats have left not only me but all true conservatives and constitutionalists. The last true constitutionalist in the House, Ron Paul, clearly is as lonely in the Republican Party as the Maytag repairman or as Sen. Jim Bunning was in standing up for fiscal sanity.

It was Winston Churchill who once wrote that "Some men change their party for the sake of their principles; others their principles for the sake of their party." Clearly, we need leaders who will put their principles ahead of their party. And we need those principles to be the right principles, the Founding Principles. Since the major parties have a stranglehold on ballot access (especially in Georgia), we (the people) need to change both major parties by infusing each one with first principles again. If the major parties won't stand for our common American principles and our common American interests, as the cliche goes, they will fall for anything...and any political expedient for partisan advantage.

Many good patriots don't get much time to spend with the Federalist Papers, the founding documents and the Founding Principles. Fret not, just keep tuning in to our commentaries and we'll see to it you get a small dose at a time. I venture to say that you will see sincere open thought, debate, discussion, along with the basis for consensus by the most endowed minds in the name of liberty.

"[Samuel] Adams in his essays and Jefferson in the Declaration state that it is our Duty to "throw off" such a government that fails to protect our inalienable rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness or which wields unjust powers without the consent of the governed. The question remains, do we have the "fortitude, perseverance and resolve" to win back our rights and liberties and to maintain them against the relentless stealth and stalking of tyranny? Or will we bear "an everlasting mark of infamy" in the minds of "millions yet unborn" who will share the misery of our failure?"
--Steve Scroggins, from the Slavery, Apologies and Duty, 3/16/07

"The liberties of our Country, the freedom of our civil constitution are worth defending at all hazards: And it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have receiv'd them as a fair Inheritance from our worthy Ancestors: They purchas'd them for us with toil and danger and expence of treasure and blood; and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle; or be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men. Of the latter we are in most danger at present: Let us therefore be aware of it. Let us contemplate our forefathers and posterity; and resolve to maintain the rights bequeath'd to us from the former, for the sake of the latter. — Instead of sitting down satisfied with the efforts we have already made, which is the wish of our enemies, the necessity of the times, more than ever, calls for our utmost circumspection, deliberation, fortitude, and perseverance. Let us remember that 'if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty, we encourage it, and involve others in our doom.' It is a very serious consideration, which should deeply impress our minds, that millions yet unborn may be the miserable sharers of the event."
---Samuel Adams (From The Rights of the Colonists, page 419) [Bold emphasis is ours]