
Jeff Davis
|
Jeff Davis is a retired radio-TV journalist living in Gainesville, GA. Active in
civic and political affairs, he is past president of the Georgia Jaycees and former campaign chairman of the Georgia
Republican party. He volunteers as chairman of the Georgia Heritage Council.
He is a collateral descendant of President Jefferson Davis and a member of SCV Camp 1404 in Gainesville and National
Chairman of Public Relations and Media for SCV.
|
Steve Scroggins is a volunteer contributor to the Georgia
Heritage Council who lives in Macon. He is the deranged creative force behind the
X-Files parody and satire feature.
|

Steve Scroggins
|
The Perils of Democracy, Part 1
Our Framers rejected democracy; the Constitution defines a Republic
- Commentary by J. A. Davis & Steve Scroggins
It shouldn't surprise you that too many, if not most, Americans believe
our country is a democracy. These misguided Americans are unaware of the perils of democracy; they are
indoctrinated to believe that democracy is pure, at the core of liberty and justice.
The Framers of the U.S. Constitution knew that
democracy is dangerous to liberty, that throughout recorded history it always led to tyranny by the majority and
ultimately to self-destruction. Democracies are notoriously unstable. Let's look at some of what they wrote on
the subject...
"A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may
take away the rights of the other forty-nine." -- Thomas Jefferson
"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have
ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in
their lives as they have been violent in their death." -- James Madison, from
Federalist #10
"It had been observed that a pure democracy if it were practicable would
be the most perfect government. Experience had proved that no position is more false than this. The ancient
democracies in which the people themselves deliberated never possessed one good feature of government. Their very
character was tyranny; their figure deformity." -- Alexander Hamilton, Speech on 21 June 1788 urging ratification of the Constitution in New York
"Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and
murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." -- John Adams, letter to
John Taylor, April 15, 1814
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" -- Benjamin Franklin
"Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that
between order and chaos." -- John Marshall, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, 1801-1835
"Had every Athenian citizen been a Socrates, every Athenian assembly
would still have been a mob." --James Madison, Federalist No. 55, February 15, 1788
"Bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority
is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights,
which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression." --Thomas Jefferson,
First
Inaugural address, 1801
It's important to stress here that the U.S. Constitution defines a
Republic, not a democracy
of any kind. The key difference is that a Republic grants only LIMITED powers to government
and safeguards the rights of the Minority and the Individual. A Democracy generally means "the Majority Unlimited." Author
Alexander Abert Long in his book entitled,
The American Ideal of 1776: The Twelve Basic American Principles,
explains the
important distinction well.
Another common misconception held by misinformed Americans is that our Constitution
grants rights to the people. Not so. We are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights; that is, those rights
are God-given. The principle expressed in the
Declaration of Independence
is that "governments are instituted among men" to secure the God-given rights of the people. Long explains the
principle of the divine
origin of rights in his Twelve Principles.
"The constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the
people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." --Patrick Henry
This misconception about the source of rights is due in part to subversive
socialist
propaganda and perhaps in part to the common name applied to the first ten amendments, the "Bill of Rights."
The
Constitution's primary purpose is to define the central government's specific and enumerated powers as divided
between its three branches, while most of
its text defines what the central government may NOT do. That is, rather than define the rights of the people, the Constitution
defines and limits the specific powers delegated to the central government by the people's agents, the state
legislatures. The people, through their states, retain ALL their rights and powers not specifically delegated to
the central government. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments repeat this intent already made clear by pre-ratification debates.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not
be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. --Ninth Amendment
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to
the people." --Tenth Amendment
No state became a party to the United States compact or 'union' unless and until it
ratified the Constitution in a convention called for that purpose. Article VII specifies that the Constitution would not take
effect unless and until at least nine of the states ratified. The common understanding in 1788 was that
each State that ratified remained a free, independent and sovereign State which had delegated only specific powers
to the common government. Originally, rather than using the plural phrase, "United States," it was thought
preferable to list each State separately as a party to the compact (The united States of Georgia, South Carolina,...etc.).
However, they realized that some States might
opt not to ratify, and they could not know in advance which ones would or would not.
"Each State, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign
body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act. In this relation, then, the new
Constitution will, if established, be a FEDERAL, and not a NATIONAL constitution." --James Madison,
Federalist No. 39, January 1788
The Framers at the 1787 Constitutional Convention had to devise a Constitution
that would limit government sufficiently to overcome the prevailing distrust of any centralized government---enough
so to persuade state conventions to ratify it. Having endured an eight year struggle to secede from the British
Empire, most Americans and all the states wanted to avoid another supreme ruler in a distant capitol.
When the proposed Constitution was published to the States for ratification
or rejection in September of 1787, passionate debates ensued in short order.
The Federalist Papers
were for the purpose of justifying the need to have a stronger federal government (stronger than the existing Articles of Confederation)
and to allay the fears of those who, justifiably, feared the consolidation of power that such a federal government
might eventually allow. In short, the Federalist Papers were written in rebuttal to the
"Anti-Federalist Papers,"
which were a series of letters critical of the proposed Constitution and published in newspapers under various
pseudonyms such as "Brutus," "Cato," and "Cincinnatus."
Without a sound and well-reasoned construction promoted by very articulate and
persuasive advocates in the persons of James Madison, John Jay and Alexander Hamilton (all writing under the
pseudonym 'Publius'), the Constitution would not likely have been ratified by the required nine states.
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal
government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and
indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation and
foreign commerce. ... The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which in the
ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives and liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal
order, improvement and prosperity of the State." --James Madison, in
Federalist Paper No. 45
Constitutional scholar Forrest McDonald describes the Constitution's text
and design as follows:
"The Constitution was designed to bring government under the rule of law,
as opposed to achieving any specific purposes....Fully 20 percent of the text is specification of things the
government, state or federal, may not do . Only 11 percent is concerned with positive grants of power.....The
main body of the Constitution, more than two thirds of it, addresses the task of making government act in
accordance with law."
Having rejected the democracy model, the Framers defined a representative
republic with elected representatives to speak for the peoples of the several states.
Misinformed Americans
fail to understand the contradiction when they vehemently argue that every citizen has the right to personally
be involved in voice and vote on virtually
every issue regardless of its relevance to the strictly limited central government's powers enumerated by the
Constitution. We often hear these folks talking about democracy, or representative
democracy based on the representatives being instructed by public plebiscite on key issues.
Seldom do they ever recognize the
distinction
and refer to our
Republic or those we elect to represent us with their own wisdom subject only to the consent of the
governed, meaning, they are answerable to the people on regular intervals.
Under this successful format the Republic has survived many leftward
thrusts to remake it a democracy---- all the way to individuals controlling every social or cultural issue
for which they are currently crusading for or against.
In many countries this form of democracy is unofficially known as
Communitarianism.
It is, or has been, the popular vogue in Europe. For more information, read some of our
previous commentary
on the subject. Essentially, it contends that collectivist "community" rights trump and supercede individual rights.
In other words, communitarianism advocates the Majority Unlimited aspect of democracy. We note with dread
that a self-described "community organizer" was recently elected President.
Communitarianism is being taught in American
law schools
and has indeed found its way into local governments throughout the United States.
Many socialists and socialist-leaning people were imported from
Europe to fight in Lincoln's War to Prevent Southern Independence and in the decades that followed.
The Communist Party in the U.S. (CPUSA) flourished from 60,000 members in 1919
(The Socialist party had about 40,000 in 1919) to almost 200,000 around World War II. It goes without saying
that most were supporters of FDR's "New Deal."
But in the 1950s with the Korean War, the Cold War, the second "Red Scare" and
the efforts of Sen. Joseph McCarthy,
membership fell to less than 10,000 by 1957. The Socialist Party of America fizzled, too, fielding their last Presidential
candidate in 1956. McCarthy was eventually pilloried for aggressively outing Communists in government and various
institutions but once he was (wrongfully! **)
censured by the U.S. Senate and discredited by the media, many socialists and Marxists continued to ply their
subversions, though with greater stealth. Many went underground or infiltrated other political parties.
Since the early 1960s, creeping, incremental socialism
has progressed through much of American political policy and many American institutions.
Cleon Skousen, in his 1958 book
"The Naked Communist,"
listed 45 Communist Goals to destroy America
from within. Number 30 on the list is "Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish
aristocrats who had no concern for the 'common man.'" Of course, number 30 goes hand-in-glove with number 29:
"Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs,
a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis."
and number 31, "Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history...."
Whether a result of intentional treachery and subversion on the part of
socialist enemies or a result of complacency, laziness and dereliction on the part of average Americans and the education
establishment---or more likely, a combination--- we can see that communist goals #29 through #31 are being accomplished
and are having the desired effect. If Americans don't know their history or how their government is supposed to work,
how can they recognize violations of the Constitution or when they're being misled about politics or history?
Too many Americans are ignorant of their history and their government. That is
an obvious and undeniable fact. The organization of facts and resources in this essay are intended to help patriots
begin to change that. Knowledge is power and it will be the key to the survival of our liberties in the future as it
has been since the founding.
In this
installment, we have defined what the
U.S. Constitution is, and its purpose and we have referenced the
core principles embodied in
it. We have reviewed irrefutable evidence that our government was not intended to be a democracy or any of its
Quixotic Utopian brothers (socialist, communist, communitarian), but rather a constitutional Republic.
We understand
that the key advantages to a Republic are the built-in protections for the rights of the Individual and
the Minority against oppression by the Majority and the checks and balances of opposing branches.
Finally, we clarified that our rights and liberties are God-given and not
granted by any government. Governments are instituted by people to secure their God-given rights; all just powers
wielded by governments are derived from the consent of the governed.
In Part 2 of this series (link coming soon), we'll explore past and
present threats to our Constitution, the damage it has endured, and how these should be
addressed going forward.
"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be
their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." --James Madison
"Democracy is the road to socialism." --Karl Marx
"In 1987, 45 percent of adult respondents to one survey answered that
the phrase 'from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs' was in the Constitution (in
fact, it's a quote from Karl Marx)." --Jonah Goldberg, in
The will of the uninformed
Related Links
The American Ideal of 1776: The Twelve Basic American Principles - Hamilton Abert Long
Founders' Wisdom v. ignorance and 'democracy' - Steve Scroggins
The Judicial Activist Coup D'Etat -- Steve Scroggins
The will of the uninformed - Jonah Goldberg
An Important Distinction: Democracy versus Republic
Liberty Lost - Part 8 - J.A. Davis
Anti Communitarian League - ACL
The Historical Evolution of Communitarian Thinking - Nikki Raapana
Note: See Chapter 7 of Sen. Barry Goldwater's book,
With No Apologies.
Also, when numerous FBI and Soviet documents were
declassified in 1995, the record proved that Sen. McCarthy was almost always right. Goldwater voted against the Senate
censure but tells the story that McCarthy could easily have avoided the censure -- but McCarthy was hard headed and refused
even a minor compromise. Goldwater knew based on the U.S. Army's behavior that McCarthy had been right in his accusations;
the Army quietly corrected the problem but never admitted McCarthy was right.
Contact: Telephone 770 297-4788 P-6, 2363 North Cliff Colony Drive Gainesvlle,
GA 30501